← Lung Nodules & Cancer

Your Patient Has a Lung Nodule
What Happens Next Determines Everything

Most lung nodules are benign. The ones that are not need to reach a specialist assessment before growth changes the prognosis. Within a single stage letter, five-year survival varies by 16 percentage points — from 92% at T1a (≤1 cm) to 76% at T1c (2–3 cm). Finding it at 8 mm and operating at 8 mm is not the same as finding it at 8 mm and reaching surgery at 25 mm. The referral threshold matters as much as the scan finding.

Last reviewed: May 2026 · Mr Lawrence Okiror FRCS(CTh) FRCSEd(CTh) · GMC 6150382

If Any of These Apply,
Specialist Assessment Is Warranted

A brief referral note to Jo Mitchelson with the CT report and recent spirometry is all that is needed. Mr Okiror reviews the imaging personally at the first appointment.

10-second summary

Solid or part-solid ≥6 mm. Any growth. Persistent GGN. Brock score doesn’t match concern. If any of these apply — or the patient cannot tolerate surveillance uncertainty — refer. Jo Mitchelson: 020 7952 2882 · pa@lungsurgeon.co.uk. Seen within 2–3 working days.

1
Solid nodule ≥6 mm or part-solid nodule ≥6 mm
BTS guideline threshold — warrants specialist assessment, not observation alone. Part-solid nodules carry a higher per-millimetre malignancy risk than pure solid nodules of the same size.
2
Any nodule demonstrating growth on serial imaging
Growth changes risk category and narrows the curative window. The time to refer is before the next scan cycle, not after.
3
Persistent ground-glass nodule (GGN)
Ground-glass nodules that persist on follow-up CT are disproportionately likely to represent adenocarcinoma spectrum disease. The Brock model systematically underscores GGN malignancy risk because it relies on patient characteristics and size rather than nodule morphology — many GGNs that Brock rates as low risk turn out to be cancers. Specialist assessment with AI-augmented risk stratification and radiomics-based analysis of nodule characteristics adds an objective layer that addresses this specific limitation.
4
Screen-detected nodule requiring MDT evaluation or tissue diagnosis
ION navigational bronchoscopy with ROSE (rapid on-site evaluation) provides a preliminary tissue diagnosis the same day — not weeks later. ICG dye injected at the time of biopsy marks the nodule for robotic resection, potentially under the same anaesthetic.
5
Brock score ≥10% — or a low Brock score that does not match clinical concern
A Brock score above 10% is a recognised threshold for further investigation. But a low Brock score does not rule out malignancy — it means the model, based on patient demographics and nodule size, rates the probability as low. Morphological features the model does not capture (internal heterogeneity, vessel contact patterns, surface texture) may tell a different story. If the clinical picture or the patient’s imaging does not sit comfortably with a low Brock score, specialist review is appropriate.
6
Patient unable to tolerate uncertainty despite surveillance recommendation
A patient with three surveillance CTs who is still unable to sleep is not well served by a fourth. One specialist appointment — with imaging review, risk stratification, and an honest conversation about what the nodule is and is not — resolves this more effectively than continued scanning.
7
Nodule in a patient with a known or prior cancer
The differential includes metastatic deposit, new primary lung cancer, and benign coincidence. The management pathway differs for each, and tissue diagnosis is often required to distinguish them. The metastasectomy pathway covers this in detail.

Beyond the Brock Score
AI Risk Stratification from Nodule Characteristics

The current standard

The Brock model is the most widely used clinical risk calculator for pulmonary nodule malignancy probability in UK practice. It combines patient characteristics — age, sex, smoking history, family history — with nodule size, type (solid or sub-solid), location, and spiculation to produce a single probability score. It is embedded in BTS guidelines and is the basis of most UK MDT triage decisions.

It has two structural limitations. First, it relies on patient demographics and coarse morphological categories rather than the rich image-derived features that the CT itself contains. Second, it systematically underscores ground-glass and sub-solid nodules — precisely the nodule types most likely to represent adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, or lepidic-predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. Many GGNs that Brock rates below the 10% intervention threshold turn out to be cancers.

What is emerging

AI-augmented risk stratification reads the CT image directly — extracting quantitative features from the nodule itself using radiomics: texture, surface morphology, internal heterogeneity, vessel contact patterns, and density gradients that human readers describe qualitatively but cannot codify. The resulting probability score does not depend on patient demographics. It analyses what the nodule looks like, not who the patient is.

This matters most for the nodules Brock handles worst. A 7 mm ground-glass nodule in a 52-year-old non-smoker might generate a Brock score of 3–4% and be placed on surveillance. Radiomics-based analysis of the same nodule — assessing internal architecture, boundary characteristics, and comparison with thousands of histologically confirmed training cases — may identify features associated with a substantially higher malignancy probability, triggering earlier specialist review and tissue diagnosis.

AI risk stratification tools are entering clinical use at major UK thoracic centres in 2026, starting with retrospective validation against institutional nodule CT databases before prospective clinical deployment. At GSTT, a pilot programme is underway. In time, these tools are expected to complement and in some scenarios replace Brock as the primary risk stratification method for indeterminate pulmonary nodules — particularly for sub-solid and ground-glass lesions where the current model underperforms.

What this means for the referring clinician today: if a nodule’s Brock score says “low risk” but the clinical picture, the imaging morphology, or the patient’s own concern says otherwise — trust the concern, not the score. Specialist assessment with access to AI-augmented tools, HRCT review, and MDT discussion is the right next step. The referral is the intervention.

One Consultant. One Pathway.
Assessment to Surgery

The NHS National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway standard is 72 hours from chest X-ray to CT scan. The median achieved nationally is 53 days. The private pathway at London Bridge Hospital collapses this to days.

Step 1
Specialist Assessment
Within 2–3 working days at London Bridge Hospital, Lister Chelsea, or outreach at Canary Wharf and City of London. Full CT/PET review, Brock score risk stratification, and management plan at the first appointment.
Step 2
ION Navigational Bronchoscopy
Where tissue diagnosis is warranted: robotic bronchoscopy with ROSE cytopathologist in the room — a preliminary diagnosis before the patient leaves the suite. ICG dye injected at the time of biopsy marks the nodule for robotic resection. GSTT: 635 ION procedures in 2024–25, the highest-volume centre in the UK.
Step 3
Robotic Resection with FireFly
Da Vinci FireFly infrared camera illuminates the ICG dye intraoperatively — precise real-time localisation for small or deep nodules. Lung-sparing segmentectomy wherever oncologically appropriate. 80%+ of resections performed robotically or by VATS.

The combined biopsy-to-resection pathway — ION navigational bronchoscopy followed by robotic anatomic resection, potentially under a single anaesthetic — is an active pathway at London Bridge Hospital. For appropriate nodules, this means tissue diagnosis and curative surgery in a single visit rather than two separate procedures weeks apart. Combined ION-to-surgery pathway →

153
Personal anatomic resections
2024–25
80%+
Robotic or VATS
minimally invasive
635
ION procedures GSTT
2024–25
99.59%
Operative survival rate
GSTT 2024–25

For the full evidence base

Lung Cancer Surgery in 2026

The full Stages I–IIIA pathway, trial data, and outcomes

AI in the Lung Cancer Pathway

Five AI decision points from screening shadow to operative field

Lung Nodules & Cancer (Patients)

Patient-facing guide to what a shadow or nodule means

Shadow on a Scan

For patients told a shadow was found on their chest scan

Refer the nodule.
Mr Okiror reviews the imaging personally.

Private appointments at London Bridge Hospital within 2–3 working days. Clinic letters to the referring GP electronically within 2 working days. 153 personal anatomic resections in 2024–25 at 99.59% operative survival rate.

Refer a Patient → For GPs

Jo Mitchelson, PA  · 020 7952 2882 · pa@lungsurgeon.co.uk

St Thomas’ #1 UK · Guy’s #2 UK · London Bridge Hospital #10 UK · Newsweek World’s Best Hospitals 2026

📅Book 📞020 7952 2882