A tumour growing in or into the main bronchus does not automatically mean losing the lung. In a sleeve resection the affected segment of airway is cut out and the cut ends are sewn back together, so that the lung beyond it keeps working. Where the tumour is confined to the wall of the bronchus — most often a carcinoid tumour — the airway alone is removed and no lung tissue is lost at all. Where a lobe is involved as well, the lobe and the bronchial segment come out together as a sleeve lobectomy and the remaining lung is reconnected. Dr Okiror performs bronchial sleeve resection with or without lung resection, sleeve lobectomy, and pulmonary artery and double sleeve reconstruction, privately at London Bridge Hospital and The Lister Hospital Chelsea and in his NHS practice at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, where he leads the Central Airways Service. Self-referrals welcome.
Last reviewed: September 2026 · Dr Lawrence Okiror FRCS(CTh) FRCSEd(CTh) · GMC 6150382
The Airway Is Rebuilt
A circumferential segment of bronchus is removed with the tumour and the cut ends are hand-sewn together. Air passes into the lung beyond it again.
Sometimes No Lung Is Removed
Where the tumour sits within the bronchial wall, the airway alone is resected and reconstructed. The whole lung is preserved.
14,194 Patients
Pooled across 27 studies, survival at one, three and five years was higher after sleeve lobectomy than after pneumonectomy.
The airways branch like a tree. The trachea divides into the left and right main bronchi, and each main bronchus divides again into the bronchi supplying each lobe. A tumour that arises at one of those junctions — at the origin of a lobar bronchus, or in the main bronchus itself — sits at the point where the airway to the whole lung passes. The traditional answer to that problem was to remove the entire lung, because removing the lobe alone would leave tumour behind at the cut edge of the bronchus.
A sleeve resection answers it differently. Instead of removing everything beyond the tumour, the surgeon removes a complete ring — a sleeve — of bronchus containing the tumour, with a clear margin above and below it, and then joins the two cut ends of the airway together. The join is a hand-sewn anastomosis. Once it has healed, air passes through it into the lung beyond exactly as it did before.
The first operation of this kind was performed in London in 1947, by Sir Clement Price Thomas at the Brompton Hospital, for a tumour of the bronchus. It has been standard practice for central airway tumours for decades since. It accounts for a small share of lung cancer operations — in the region of 6 to 8 per cent of resections — which is why it is worth asking about specifically rather than assuming it has been considered.
The distinction that matters
Patients are frequently told that they need “a sleeve” without being told which of the two operations is meant. They are not the same. One removes a lobe of lung; the other removes no lung at all. Which applies depends on whether the tumour is confined to the wall of the bronchus or has grown outward into the lobe beyond it.
Four bodies of evidence bear on the same question: where a central tumour can be removed either by taking the whole lung or by resecting and rebuilding the airway, which operation should be done? The comparisons are observational rather than randomised, and that qualification matters — but they point consistently in one direction.
27 Studies · 14,194 Patients
Translational Lung Cancer Research · 2019 · 4,145 sleeve lobectomy, 10,049 pneumonectomy
Overall survival was significantly higher after sleeve lobectomy at one, three and five years. The pneumonectomy group had higher operative mortality, higher 30-day mortality, and a higher rate of distant recurrence. In patients with N0 and N1 disease, five-year survival after sleeve resection exceeded that after pneumonectomy; in N2 disease the difference at three and five years was not statistically significant.
The nodal subgroup finding is the important detail. Where the mediastinal nodes are involved, the extent of the lung resection is no longer what drives the outcome.
19 Studies · 3,878 Patients
Shi et al. · World Journal of Surgical Oncology · 2012
Pooled postoperative mortality was 2.91% after sleeve lobectomy against 5.86% after pneumonectomy — an odds ratio of 0.50. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.63 in favour of sleeve resection. Rates of postoperative complications and of locoregional recurrence did not differ significantly between the two operations.
Locoregional recurrence is the objection most often raised against sleeve resection — that leaving the lung behind leaves disease behind. The pooled data do not support it.
Extended Sleeve · 431 Patients
Meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data · 2022 · 9 studies
Extended sleeve lobectomy — where more than one lobe is removed and the airway reconstructed — was compared with pneumonectomy using pooled individual patient data. Overall survival favoured the sleeve group (hazard ratio 0.63) as did disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.57), and both findings held on sensitivity analysis.
This matters because extended sleeve is the operation that most often stands between a patient and a pneumonectomy when the disease is bulkier than a simple sleeve can clear.
Approach · 188 Patients
Propensity score-weighted comparison · JTCVS · 2020 · robotic 49, VATS 73, open 66
After weighting, there was no difference in 90-day mortality or morbidity between the three approaches. The robotic group had less blood loss, shorter operative time and shorter drainage time, with no positive bronchial margin and no conversion. Separate series of completely portal robotic airway sleeve resection report a median stay of three days with no 30- or 90-day mortality and no anastomotic stricture at a median of 18 months.
These are small, selected series from experienced centres. They establish that a robotic sleeve resection is a legitimate operation in the right case — not that it is the right operation in every case.
The qualification that belongs with all of this. None of these comparisons is randomised, and patients selected for pneumonectomy tend to have larger, more central and more node-positive tumours than those selected for sleeve resection. Part of the survival difference is a difference in disease rather than a difference in operation. A sleeve resection is chosen because a complete resection can be achieved with a sound reconstruction — not simply because it preserves lung. Where the airway cannot be cleared and rebuilt, removing the whole lung is the correct operation and the evidence above does not argue against it.
This is the operation most patients do not know exists. Where a tumour grows within the wall of the bronchus and does not extend outward into the surrounding lung, the whole problem is a segment of airway. That segment is removed and the airway rebuilt. The lung beyond it is untouched, re-expands after the operation, and continues to work.
The tumours that behave this way are, most commonly, bronchial carcinoid tumours. These are slow-growing neuroendocrine tumours which often arise in a main or lobar bronchus, frequently in younger patients, and which are commonly mistaken for asthma for months or years because they cause wheeze, cough and repeated infection in the same part of the lung. Typical carcinoid tumours are cured by complete surgical removal in the great majority of cases. Removing an entire lung from a young patient to treat a tumour sitting inside a centimetre of bronchus is a poor trade where a sleeve resection can clear it.
The same principle applies to some rarer airway tumours — low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma, which spreads along the inside of the airway wall and therefore needs generous margins along its length. These are discussed further on the rare chest tumours page.
Dr Okiror has performed bronchial sleeve resection without lung resection at the left main bronchus and at the bronchus intermedius — the segment of airway between the right upper lobe and the lower part of the right lung, which is the commonest site for a carcinoid tumour that can be treated this way.
A patient with a carcinoid tumour in the bronchus intermedius who is offered a pneumonectomy, and a patient with the same tumour who is offered a bronchial sleeve resection, are being offered two very different futures. The question to ask is whether the tumour is confined to the wall of the airway — and that is answered by bronchoscopy and CT before surgery, and confirmed by inspection at the operation.
Where the tumour involves both the lobar bronchus and the lobe it supplies, the lobe is removed — as in a standard lobectomy — together with a circumferential segment of the adjacent main bronchus. The two remaining cut ends of the airway are then joined, reconnecting the rest of that lung to the trachea. The commonest version is a right upper lobe sleeve lobectomy, where the right upper lobe and a sleeve of the right main bronchus are removed and the bronchus intermedius is sewn to the main bronchus.
The comparison to hold in mind is what the alternative costs. A right pneumonectomy removes around 55 per cent of the lung tissue and the corresponding share of the pulmonary vascular bed. A right upper lobe sleeve lobectomy removes the upper lobe and keeps the rest. For a patient with limited breathing reserve, that difference decides whether surgery is possible at all — which is why borderline lung function is one of the strongest indications to attempt a sleeve reconstruction.
A sleeve lobectomy is also indicated where bulky lymph nodes at the origin of a lobar bronchus make a standard lobectomy impossible — the node involvement extends into the bronchial wall, so the bronchus must be resected further back than a lobectomy allows.
How the join is made
Dr Okiror’s technique for the bronchial anastomosis is described in the chapter he co-authored on primary lung tumours in Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Surgery (Springer, 2018): absorbable suture throughout, running continuously along the membranous back wall of the bronchus and placed as interrupted stitches around the cartilaginous front wall. The membranous and cartilaginous parts of the airway behave differently and are sewn differently for that reason.
The pulmonary artery runs alongside the bronchus, and a central tumour frequently involves both. Involvement of the interlobar pulmonary artery has historically been one of the standard reasons to proceed to pneumonectomy: if the artery to the remaining lobes cannot be preserved, the lobes cannot be preserved either.
The artery can also be reconstructed. Where tumour involves a segment of the pulmonary artery, that segment is resected and the artery repaired or reconstructed — a pulmonary artery sleeve, also called an arterial sleeve. Where the bronchus and the artery are both involved, both are resected and both reconstructed in the same operation. That is a double sleeve, or bronchovascular sleeve resection.
It is a longer and more demanding operation than a bronchial sleeve alone, it requires control of the pulmonary artery above and below the resected segment, and it is performed in a minority of units. Its value is straightforward: it moves the boundary of what can be preserved. Patients whose tumour involves both structures, and who would otherwise be offered a pneumonectomy, may keep the rest of that lung.
Dr Okiror performs pulmonary artery sleeve and double sleeve resection. As with bronchial sleeve resection, the operation is undertaken only where a complete resection can be achieved; where the artery cannot be reconstructed with a clear margin, the correct operation is a pneumonectomy.
In Dr Okiror’s practice a sleeve resection includes bronchoscopy at three separate points, all under the same anaesthetic on the day of surgery. This is how he conducts the operation; it is not a separate procedure or an extra admission.
At the start
Before the resection begins, the airway is inspected from inside to establish how far the tumour extends along the bronchus in both directions. That determines where the bronchus will be divided. A CT scan shows the bulk of a tumour well; it is less reliable about how far disease creeps along the airway wall, and that distance is precisely what sets the resection margin.
After the anastomosis
Once the two ends of the bronchus have been sewn together, the join is inspected from inside. The mucosal edges should meet accurately and the lumen should be open and round. A problem identified at this point can be corrected while the chest is still open, which is not true of a problem identified afterwards.
At the end
Before the patient is woken, blood and secretions are cleared from the airway and the reconstruction is confirmed to be patent. Retained secretions behind a fresh anastomosis are a cause of early trouble, and clearing them before the patient leaves theatre is part of preventing it.
Diagnostic bronchoscopy before admission is a separate matter and is usually already part of the work-up by the time a patient reaches a surgical opinion. Airway assessment and intervention outside the context of resection is covered on the central airway interventions page.
Most of Dr Okiror’s lung cancer operations are performed robotically or by keyhole technique. Sleeve resection is the part of the practice where that is not the default. Open thoracotomy remains his most common approach to a sleeve resection, and it remains the standard for complex airway reconstruction generally.
He does perform sleeve resection robotically in selected cases. What decides the approach is the reconstruction: the extent of airway to be resected, the position of the anastomosis and how accessible it is, the quality of the bronchial tissue to be joined, whether the pulmonary artery is involved as well, and whether previous treatment has scarred the tissue planes. Where all of those favour it, the operation can be completed robotically to the same standard. Where they do not, an open approach gives the control the reconstruction needs.
Patients who have read about minimally invasive surgery sometimes hear an open approach as a step backwards. It is not. The access is chosen to fit the operation, in both directions: a lobectomy is done robotically because that suits it, and a complex airway reconstruction is done openly for the same kind of reason. An anastomosis that leaks or narrows is the complication that matters most in this operation, and nothing is traded against getting it right.
In this practice
Across six audited years of SCTS returns, Dr Okiror performed 14 sleeve lobectomies. Over the two most recent audited years, six patients underwent sleeve resection for every one who underwent pneumonectomy. That ratio reflects the case mix referred and the anatomy encountered in those particular patients; it is not a target, and it is not a claim that a sleeve resection can replace a pneumonectomy whenever one is proposed.
Non-small cell lung cancer at the origin of a lobar bronchus or involving the adjacent main bronchus · bronchial carcinoid tumours · low-grade salivary-type airway tumours · bulky N1 nodes at a lobar orifice preventing standard lobectomy · patients whose breathing reserve will not tolerate pneumonectomy · patients whose tumour has responded to chemoimmunotherapy and pulled back from the structures it originally involved
Tumour extending along the bronchus beyond what can be resected with a clear margin · involvement of every lobar orifice on that side · extensive longitudinal involvement of the main pulmonary artery that cannot be reconstructed · disease crossing the fissure into more than one lobe in a pattern a sleeve cannot clear · any situation in which the reconstruction would be achieved only by accepting an incomplete resection
Everyone considered for a sleeve resection is assessed as though a pneumonectomy might be necessary. Occasionally the disease at operation proves more extensive than the imaging suggested, and completing the resection means removing the whole lung. Fitness is therefore assessed against the larger operation, with lung function testing and, where reserve is limited, cardiopulmonary exercise testing — set out on the lung function and fitness pages. Consent for a sleeve resection includes that possibility, discussed before the day rather than explained afterwards.
The early recovery follows the pattern of the approach used. Where the operation has been performed openly, the hospital stay is longer than after a keyhole lobectomy and pain control is planned in advance rather than improvised afterwards — the approaches used are described on the pain relief after thoracic surgery page. General guidance on the weeks afterwards is on the recovery after lung surgery page.
What is specific to a sleeve resection is the anastomosis. It needs to heal, and healing depends on a good blood supply to the bronchial ends and on the lung beyond it inflating properly. Clearing secretions in the first days matters more than after a standard lobectomy, and physiotherapy starts early for that reason.
Follow-up is clinical and by CT. Bronchoscopy afterwards is not routine; it is arranged where something raises a question about the join — a cough that persists, a wheeze localised to one side, breathlessness that does not settle in the expected way, or an infection recurring in the same part of the lung. Narrowing at the anastomosis is uncommon and is treatable when it is found early, which is the reason those symptoms are worth reporting rather than waiting out.
Where the pathology shows nodal involvement, adjuvant treatment is discussed at the multidisciplinary team meeting in the usual way. Having had a sleeve resection rather than a pneumonectomy generally makes systemic treatment easier to tolerate, because more lung has been kept.
The other side of the decision
Sometimes removing the whole lung is the right operation.Where the airway cannot be cleared and rebuilt, a pneumonectomy achieves what a sleeve resection cannot, and it is well tolerated in properly selected patients. The indications, the fitness assessment, and what life with one lung is actually like are set out separately.
Questions asked by patients who have been told that a tumour involves the main bronchus, and by those weighing a sleeve resection against removal of the whole lung.
Request a Second Opinion →Or call Jo Mitchelson:
020 7952 2882
Appointments within 2–3 days. Self-referrals welcome. Surgery at London Bridge Hospital and The Lister Hospital Chelsea.
Jo Mitchelson, PA · 020 7952 2882 · pa@lungsurgeon.co.uk
St Thomas’ Hospital #1 UK · Guy’s Hospital #2 UK · London Bridge Hospital #10 UK · Newsweek World’s Best Hospitals 2026
When removing the whole lung is the correct operation — indications, fitness assessment, and life with one lung
Robotic & VATS LobectomyThe standard lung cancer resection — what a lobectomy involves and why the lymph node dissection matters
Central Airway InterventionsAssessment and treatment of disease in the trachea and main bronchi — stenting, debulking and airway reconstruction
Locally Advanced Lung CancerStage III disease, nodal staging, and how the treatment sequence is decided before any operation
Chest Wall InvasionEn bloc resection of lung and ribs — the third of the complex resections, with reconstruction
Borderline Lung FunctionWhere breathing reserve is limited and the extent of resection decides whether surgery is possible
Rare Lung and Chest TumoursCarcinoid, adenoid cystic and mucoepidermoid tumours of the airway — the pathology behind many sleeve resections
Surgery After ChemoimmunotherapyWhere systemic treatment comes first and may reduce the extent of resection needed
Lung Cancer Second OpinionIndependent review of imaging, staging and the surgical recommendation — within 2–3 days